Sometimes terrible movies deserve a second chance.
If you could go back and watch any bad movie again, which one would it be?
Going back and revisiting an awful movie could actually result in a better appreciation for it.
I’m not holding my breath because my pick is:
Super Mario Bros
Yuck.
I’ve only seen this movie once but if it’s as terrible as I remember, I may be in for a long night.
How bad is that trailer first of all?
Truthfully, I’m not even planning on seeing it again any time soon. I just think it would be interesting to see it again. Having said that, I’m not in any hurry after checking out the trailer again.
What the hell is that thing? A Goomba?
I specifically remember biking to the movie and renting this movie. I love Super Mario games.
Every. Single. One of them.
After watching the film adaptation, I remember feeling betrayed. It was nothing like the most beloved video game franchise of all time.
Still… I wouldn’t mind seeing it again.
Now that I’m older and wiser, I know that attempting a live action Mario Bros movie was an awful idea from the start.
Yesterday, I was talking about James Cameron’s Avatar and the new technology behind it. He isn’t the only one pushing state-of-the-art technology. Robert Zemeckis has been rolling out performance capture films for a while now. Yet, none have really been that successful. (At least, not once you compare them to recent 3D animating films.) This weekend, he unleashed what should have been a smash hit. It certainly made money but no where near what the filmmakers were expecting. Let’s look at the facts:
Beloved story? Check.
Jim Carrey? Check.
3D? Check.
Even with those pieces in place the film only managed to gross 31 million this weekend. Way below expectations. Compare that to the 68 million Pixar’s Up made in it’s opening weekend. Ice Age 3 only made 41 million but went on to become a gigantic world wide success. I don’t think A Christmas Carol will come close to those numbers. Are people just not getting it? (Makes you wonder about the current skepticism about Avatar doesn’t it?)
The Polar Express
This is Captain Back To The Future’s third attempt with performance capture. Tom Hanks and The Polar Express opened with 23 million. Beowulf didn’t do much better. Most of the complaints I’ve read stem from the ‘dead eyes’ look most of the characters have. I get the critisism but it’s still pretty groundbreaking animation. I think hyper-real animation has a while to go. People just seem to identify more with classic cartoons and exagerated characters. Personally, I’m a fan of every cartoon there is. I’ll be catching this movie eventually. It’s just hasn’t risen up my list of must-see films yet.
Still the performance captured films made money which is why Mr. Zemekis can continue with new projects. They just haven’t pulled in earth shattering numbers yet. I honestly thought A Christmas Carol had a shot at 50 million at least.
Can the technology behind the film really be blamed though? Perhaps it’s attachment to the older adaptations. Take Willy Wonka for example. The Tim Burton remake had all the elements that should have added up to a massive success. Yet everyone still holds the original closer to their hearts. When it comes to A Christmas Carol, Disney’s timeless version wins for me.
Every year in the history of Christmas or years on channel 8 at 8pm (Eastern Time) I watched this movie. It’s just not Christmas without it. Sadly, I haven’t watched it in a few years but thanks to the miracle of YouTube, it’s on my list right after The Sandlot. (Anyone who spots a DVD copy of Mickey’s Christmas Carol needs to notify me immediately by the way.)
It’s strange that many movies have tried to establish new Christmas traditions but haven’t. I wonder if the younger generations will look back at Jim Carrey’s Scrooge the same way I look at the duck whos name is also Scrooge.
(I’ve included part 1 to brighten everyone’s day. Sweet flick.)
Another absolute classic is A Muppet Christmas Carol. My sister and I make time to watch that old VHS once as year. So really there are already 2 mainstays in my yearly Dickens fix. Is there room for one more? I’m keeping an open mind.
Regardless of technology or nostalgia, I’m sure the new version is entertaining. Maybe it’s the release date. Would the film benefit from being released closer to Christmas? I think the theory behind it is to maximize on all the weeks leading up to the holidays. For the sake of NEW traditions, I hope the film has legs.
I can honestly remember a day when I watched this movie, rewound and then watched it again. I’m definitely up for another trip to Toon Town. This is a movie that can’t miss when it comes to traditions. A sequel with better technology and the ORIGINAL writers! I really hope this movie happens. It’d be amazing. I would be very happy about a Roger Rabbit sequel.
FUN FACT: While looking for a kick ass Roger Rabbit pic I came across the image above. It’s a book on cassette! Remember books on cassettes? I USED TO OWN THAT! I probably still do. (I’ll calm down eventually.)
One final thought on the topic of hyper-real animation… Take a look at this picture from a site called Pixeloo:
I don’t think the world is ready for that either…
UPDATE: In it’s second weekend of release, A Christmas Carol held strong losing only 26% of it’s opening weekend audience taking in 22.3 million. Looks like it does have some legs. Good.